The “one China” principle has prevented Taiwan from joining the WHO. This is wrong. In the wake of the out-of-control Wuhan coronavirus, Taiwan should be permitted to join the WHO under the name of “Taiwan” and it should exist as a separate country within the WHO.
At a time when Beijing has partially locked down more than 80 cities in nearly 20 provinces, and at a time when the official death toll exceeds more than 1,380 people with more than 63,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 as of Friday, Taiwan — home to nearly 24 million people — is being blocked from membership from UN agencies like the WHO and the International Civil Aviation Organization.
“Last week, when WHO started to publish a world map of the epidemic using color coding to indicate the same level of seriousness, Taiwan was given same level as China. That has a direct impact on Taiwanese people and airlines that are traveling there,” said Chi Chun-huei (紀駿輝), a Taiwanese-American professor at Oregon State University who specializes in global health.
On Thursday last week, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused China, which includes Taiwan on its daily update as “Taiwan Province,” of feeding incorrect data to the WHO, and complained about how the WHO referred to the nation. The WHO calls the self-governed territory “Taipei and environs.”
Previously, it has used “Taiwan, China,” “Taipei municipality” and “Taipei.” However, these are not the correct names for it. Its rightful name is Taiwan, and its formal name is the Republic of China.
Clearly the WHO is succumbing to political pressure from Beijing. Beijing sees itself as the ruler of democratic Taiwan, and has used its clout to diminish the nation’s presence on the world stage since Beijing-skeptic President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took power in May 2016.
The WHO should be a nonpolitical organization pursuing the highest health standards for humanity and should not solely serve Beijing’s interests. This represents a failure of leadership at the highest levels of the WHO.
With the number of illnesses from the Wuhan coronavirus doubling every six-and-a-half days, health is a basic human right, as well as a universal value, regardless of differences in race, religion, political beliefs, economic or social situations.
Taiwan is constantly left out of the loop with respect to important global conversations that involve people’s safety. It is not just the people of Taiwan’s safety, but the safety of those across borders. While Taiwanese health officials receive information on unfolding health crises such as COVID-19 from counterparts in China or elsewhere, no formal mechanism exists to ensure that it is received in a timely manner.
Taiwan should be allowed equal participation in all WHO events.
Taiwan has the best healthcare system in the world, business magazine CEOWorld concluded in its 2019 Health Care Index. The list considered the overall quality of healthcare, including the infrastructure, staff competency, cost, availability and government readiness, the magazine said.
Taiwan has a history of managing previous outbreaks in the region well, from SARS to African swine fever. It should not simply be a passive recipient of thirdhand information; it should have a seat at the table in WHO planning and preparatory meetings.
Instead of shunning Taiwan, the WHO should cooperate with medical institutions throughout the nation to help procure a low-cost vaccine for COVID-19 that the WHO could distribute at cost to the countries south of the Sahara, the Middle East and North Africa.
The coronavirus outbreak is deeply worrying, but also a timely reminder that Taiwan needs to be readmitted to the WHO and other international bodies.
It is also in the national interests of Australia, Japan, South Korea and the US to encourage greater interaction in areas like health with Taiwan.
Taiwan has a long history of being bullied by China, a situation that many other countries are slowly waking up to. Only international support can resist Beijing’s efforts to erase Taiwan. Democratic countries should stand together to prove that democracy is not just a different but a better form of government than authoritarianism.
Arthur Tane is executive director of the Council on Middle East Relations, director of the Middle East-East Asia Office and the MEES series editor.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing